PreTrial Motions and Hearings Regarding Evidence Admissibility Charleston

PreTrial Motions and Hearings Regarding Evidence Admissibility Charleston

Representing Victims of Sexual Abuse in Court South Carolina

Pre-trial motions and hearings regarding evidence admissibility in Charleston can be highly complex and confusing. These proceedings involve an analysis of the relevancy, materiality, prejudicial effect, and reliability of the evidence sought to be admitted. In these hearings, attorneys will argue for or against certain types of evidence being presented in court. Depending on the type of evidence at issue, the judge may grant a motion to exclude it from consideration as part of the trial process. Additionally, both parties may make requests to admit specific types of evidence that could potentially prove decisive if allowed into the record. Such decisions are made based on varying factors such as whether or not a witness is available to testify regarding its authenticity or accuracy. Ultimately, it is up to the presiding judge to decide what evidence should be admitted and excluded during a pre-trial hearing in Charleston.

Charleston may also refer to: Charleston most commonly refers to:

About Charleston


Reviews for McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC


McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC

Jody McKnight

(5)

These lawyers are some of he finest lawyers in the State of South Carolina. As a colleague, I've watched them successfully handle some of the most complex, difficult cases that lawyers in the area of medical malpractice and other forms of complex litigation handle. Their history of settlements and verdicts on large complex matters speaks volumes. They have a reputation amongst the best lawyers in our state, as being one of the top law firms for complex litigation.

McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC

Tam Van Kirk

(5)

Excellent Firm! Incredibly helpful and supportive while dealing with a tough situation. I highly recommend! To Lead Coordinator April and Attorney Hood, I thank you so much for your time and assistance.

McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC

Brian Kent

(5)

Randy Hood and the folks at his firm are the best in the business. As a practicing lawyer for the past 18 years representing people who have been severely injured or victimized, I can confidently say that I would trust them to represent even my own family and friends if the need ever arose. They are honest, compassionate and their work ethic and approach to the law is beyond compare.

McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC

Chris Burrows

(5)

Extremely professional. Highly competent. Very skilled. Couldn't have been happier.

McGowan, Hood, Felder & Phillips, LLC

Kim Jones

(5)

Great firm!

Frequently Asked Questions

Relevant witness testimony, physical or documentary evidence, and expert reports may all be admissible.
Attorneys should provide coaching on expectations of the courtroom environment and how to effectively answer questions posed by opposing counsel.
Yes, motions can potentially alter the course of a case depending on whether they are granted or denied by the court.
Lawyers should understand local rules and procedures as well as cite relevant case law that is applicable to their argument for admissibility.